Crowdsourcing involves soliciting input from the public, usually on a digital platform, to address market gaps and surface promising solutions in an open, efficient way. It often has a voting component wherein the top-voted ideas win support. Crowdsourcing uses collective intelligence to help creative ideas rise to the top – while generating a real-time feedback loop and a shared sense of ownership in the project.
Crowdsourcing facilitates problem-solving and innovation across all sectors. In the private sphere, GOOD helped launch the Pepsi Refresh Challenge, a $20 million campaign that channeled Pepsi’s marketing dollars to ignite citizen activism. Social impact endeavors like the Knight Foundation News Challengeand the Case Foundation’s America’s Giving Challenge harness broad-reaching input about information-sharing and philanthropic giving.
With LA2050, an initiative to create, drive, and track a shared vision for the future of Los Angeles, the Goldhirsh Foundation relies heavily on crowdsourcing. Citizen input via crowdsourcing assists us in investing a total of $1 million annually via the MyLA2050 Grants Challenge to 10 organizations (both for-profit and non-profit) with ideas that shape a better future for Los Angeles.
For two years, we have run this crowdsourced campaign to great acclaim – generating about 300 vetted projects per year and engaging more than 70,000 people in the voting process. Crowdsourcing encourages creative idea generation and promotion, enables us to connect the dots among ideas, supporters, and entrepreneurs, and allows us to co-create solutions for the future of Los Angeles.
Crowdsourcing benefits and concerns
Crowdsourcing is an effective tool to helprealize an organization’s goals, whether you are an entrepreneur seeking funding, an investor exploring a new idea, or a civic organization trying to identify a breakthrough process.
Benefits for funders:
Exposure to new organizations, ideas, and funding. Crowdsourcing brings funders closer to real problems and solutions. Some applicants that didn’t get funding from LA2050 went on to receive more than $1 million in follow-on funding from the Annenberg Foundation and the Roy and Patricia Disney Foundation.
Community engagement. Crowdsourcing enabled us to engage more than 70,000 people a year, putting private dollars to public use. As a result, we now have a group of Angelenos who have opted to receive information about the organizations they supported, and who care about a better future for LA.
Emerging trends. By analyzing the data that emerged from the 2013 MyLA2050 Grants Challenge, we identified promising trends that could create significant change – trends that we also see in the private and civic sector, like sharing economy solutions and the re-purposing of public space. By sharing this data in our report with other funders and leaders, we identified approaches that could help other organizations progress.
Benefits for entrepreneurs:
Earned media. Projects that compete in a crowdsourced challenge can receive exposure to new audiences via earned media. The MyLA2050 Grants Challenge garnered significant radio, print, and digital media coverage about the ideas we were showcasing – both challenge winners and those that did not win.
Marketing inspiration. Participation in a crowdsourced challenge forces you to crystallize your idea or project, and pushes you to create videos, photos, tweets, and pithy messaging to promote your project.
Landscape knowledge. By showcasing a range of projects, crowdsourcing can help organizations better differentiate themselves from their competitors. Simultaneously, this fosters collaboration between organizations that have similar visions and theories of change or that work along a similar continuum.
Exposure to other funders, investors and partners. As mentioned, even organizations that didn’t win a MyLA2050 grant reported more than $1 million in follow-on funding from other sources, based directly on exposure generated through the challenge.
Engaged feedback. Crowdsourcing helps establish a dynamic relationship between organizations and their supporters, including immediate feedback on projects.
Crowdsourcing also raises legitimate concerns that need to be addressed:
Isn’t this just a popularity contest? The idea most likely to succeed or to have the most impact may not win if the organization behind it has a small online constituency. To address this concern in our 2014 challenge, we allowed the public vote to determine five winners, while the foundation team chose the other five winners.
Competition pits social sector groups against each other. What crowdsourcing really does is allow groups to compete publicly and transparently. When entrepreneurs submit their proposals to an investor, the selection is made behind closed doors, by a few people. We addressed this issue by encouraging more collaboration among participants and favoring collaborations in our selection process. We also hosted networking events for entrepreneurs to meet each other and join one another’s projects.
There aren’t enough benefits for participants who don’t win. In our second year we spent a full month honoring and promoting the submissions – before voting even began. In this way, we were able to showcase all the great ideas that were submitted.
Crowdsourcing Resource Guide for Entrepreneurs and Investors
Whether you are looking for a way to expand your funding, generate awareness about innovative ideas, unleash potential within your constituent base or increase participation in your initiatives, tapping into the crowd may help. The guide below offers some resources on how to effectively crowdsource – for both entrepreneurs and investors.